News and Media Research Centre
University of Canberra
Building 9, Level C, Room 10
Research impact library
People-focused law graduates
The traditional focus of legal education is hindering students’ understanding of the law's social context. To address this, UC adopted a case-based approach informed by research, immersing students in real-world legal issues to foster a deeper understanding of this social context while developing essential legal skills.
Teaching social context in the foundations of law
Many people’s experiences with the legal system can be emotionally and financially draining, even traumatic, so working with legal professionals who are empathetic and socially aware can make a significant difference to the experiences of their clients and others. But do legal professionals learn these skills at university?
Australian legal students need to understand the laws and statutes that govern Australia, its states and territories so they are competent and qualified, however, a criticism of this focus on doctrine only is it produces graduates who lack empathy or understanding of the social context of our legal system and the people it affects. The national law curriculum expects Bachelor of Laws students to understand the broader sociocultural impacts of the law, which relies on teaching the social context of law at our universities and placing priority on this alongside teaching laws and statutes.
PhD research conducted by Andrew Henderson at the Australian National University, who is also a teacher at the University of Canberra, sought Bachelor of Laws students’ perceptions of how their studies affected how they think about the law and their feedback on a case study approach to teaching social context. A change to a first-year UC law and justice studies unit was then implemented and tested in mid-2023.
There is a lack of research on whether a doctrinal focus actually affects law students’ social understanding of law. Andrew’s interviews with 65 UC and ANU law students sought to fill a 'law-student-sized hole' in research on the effects of the Australian explicit legal education curriculum. He asked law students to identify their perceptions of the causes and effects of law school's curriculum in their own words.
One of the themes tracked through the interviews was students' perceptions that they developed critical thinking skills and an awareness of the social and emotional context of legal issues despite their law school education, rather than because of it. The findings suggest a focus on doctrine may, in fact, be excluding or even devaluing law's social and cultural effects. The research found that law schools have an opportunity to actively encourage students to think critically and consider broader issues beyond legal doctrine.
As a result of this research, a change in the curriculum for UC’s Foundations of Law and Justice unit, a required first-year unit for Bachelor of Justice Studies and Bachelor of Laws students, was implemented. This unit is intended to teach some of the essential skills students need for their ongoing studies and in the workplace, including how to read the law (for example, interpreting legislation and the common law) and how to apply and explain it (for example, writing legal advice). Rather than teaching these things as isolated skills, a case analysis approach was adopted, which draws on a real-world, current issue. The case involved Indigenous fishing on the NSW south coast and the challenges presented by NSW fisheries management arrangements.
By delving deeper into the context surrounding the case, students concurrently developed a more comprehensive understanding of the legal issues at hand.
One student said:
“Using the same legal problem to illustrate examples for statutes and case law made it easier to apply what we'd learned. I think this is because we already understood the facts of the problem and didn't need to relearn a new set of facts. Personally, I also felt emotionally involved in helping Trevor [the subject of the case study], which I felt made me do better.”
In a small survey asking for students views on the implementation of the case study approach, students agreed:
- That the use of a single case study made interpreting statutes, reading cases, and preparing advice easier to understand; and
- That it helped them consider the broader social context in which the legal issue arose.
Students also offered valuable feedback on how the approach could be further developed, which will be implemented in future units.
University of Canberra’s Head of Canberra Law School, Professor Maree Sainsbury, supports the case study approach, saying:
“This creative approach to legal education engaged students and effectively addressed several key Threshold Learning Outcomes (TLO) for the Bachelor of Laws… Adopting a case study method, rather than teaching skills in isolation, encouraged students to consider the social context surrounding the cases, developing their ability to recognise and reflect upon the professional responsibilities of lawyers in promoting justice and serving the community [TLO 2].
“By focusing on an Indigenous fishing case study, Andrew has also advanced the University's priority of Indigenising its curriculum. This approach has enriched the students' learning experience while exposing them to some of the challenges they may face in their future legal careers.”
Research team
Andrew Henderson, PhD candidate at the Australian National University College of Law in collaboration with UC’s Canberra Law School, in the Faculty of Business, Government and Law.